CMP 170HX vs GeForce GT 230
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4432 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+7996%
12630
GeForce GT 230
156
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
6
4480
Shading Units
48
280
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G94B
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
