Home Comparison CMP 170HX vs GeForce 9800 GX2

CMP 170HX vs GeForce 9800 GX2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GX2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9800 GX2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (197W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +3189%
12630
GeForce 9800 GX2
384

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Mar 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
16
4480
Shading Units
128
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
197W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G92
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G92-450-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net