CMP 170HX vs FireMV 2250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
-
280
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV516
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0
