CMP 170HX vs Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 559.6GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (2200MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12630
Arc A780
+42%
18020
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6X
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
4096
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
128
280
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
DG2-512
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
