Atom S1220 vs AMD EPYC 9825
We compared two server CPUs: Atom S1220 with 2 cores 1.6GHz and AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Atom S1220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (8W vs 390W)
AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.6GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)
Score
General Parameters
Dec 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Centerton
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel BGA 1283
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Atom (Centerton)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Package
-
Transistor Count
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
8 W
Power Consumption
390 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
144
-
Performance Core Threads
288
1.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
2
Total Core Count
144
4
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
16.0
Multiplier
21.0
56 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
