ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs GeForce GT 610 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 610 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 29W)
GeForce GT 610 PCI 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.67GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
42
GeForce GT 610 PCI
+271%
156
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
40
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
29W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV610
GPU Name
GF119
RV610 LE AGP
(215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1