Arc Pro A60M vs RTX A2000 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1300MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
RTX A2000 Max Q 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M
5325
RTX A2000 Max Q
+16%
6180
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
256
Tensor Cores
80
16
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
95W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
GA107
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
