Arc Pro A60M vs Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1300MHz vs 1266MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M
5325
Radeon E9550 MXM
+9%
5834
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Sep 2016
Alchemist
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
2048
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
95W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
Ellesmere
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
