Arc Pro A60M vs GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1300MHz vs 797MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M
+117%
5325
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
2448
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Nov 2013
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
797 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.0 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.448 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
102.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
122W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
N14E-GTX-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
