Arc Pro A60M vs Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1300MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Arc A350M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M
+201%
5325
Arc A350M
1766
Blender
Arc Pro A60M
+191%
1144
Arc A350M
392
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Mar 2022
Alchemist
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
6
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
DG2-128
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
