Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs GMA X3500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
896 additional rendering cores
GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)
Score
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Aug 2007
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
1
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
667.0 MPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.336 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
13W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake (G35)
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Generation 4.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
