Arc A770M vs P106M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770M and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A770M 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1650MHz vs 1291MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
P106M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770M
+354%
13520
P106M
2974
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2019
Alchemist
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
9
4096
Shading Units
1152
256
TMUs
72
128
ROPs
32
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
211.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
422.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
27.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GP106
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
