Arc A770M vs FirePro M8900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A770M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770M
+935%
13520
FirePro M8900
1306
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
4096
Shading Units
960
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
211.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
422.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
27.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Blackcomb
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
