Arc A750 vs Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 281W)
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (2525MHz vs 2400MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A750
17200
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
+163%
45250
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Apr 2023
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2050 MHz
Base Clock
1895 MHz
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
2525 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
70
3584
Shading Units
4480
224
TMUs
280
112
ROPs
128
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
70
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
16 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
323.2 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.0 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
90.50 TFLOPS
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.25 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
281W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Navi 31
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Generation 12.7
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
