Arc A750 vs GeForce GT 430 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A750
+6294%
17200
GeForce GT 430 PCI
269
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Oct 2010
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
96
224
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
49W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF108
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
