Arc A750 vs FirePro RG220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A750
+21400%
17200
FirePro RG220
80
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
May 2010
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
3584
Shading Units
80
224
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
M93
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
