Arc A550M vs RTX A2000 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A550M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A550M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1207MHz vs 900MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A550M
3686
RTX A2000 Max Q
+67%
6180
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
16
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
115.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
7.373 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GA107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
