Arc A380 vs Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 1000W)
Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (2100MHz vs 2050MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
4198
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+1846%
81720
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Oct 2024
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
96bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
1024
Shading Units
19456
64
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
128
Tensor Cores
1216
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
153 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
