Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 560
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+285%
4198
GeForce GTX 560
1089
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
May 2011
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
7
1024
Shading Units
336
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.34 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.36 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1089 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GF114
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GF114-325-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
