Arc A380 vs FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
FireStream 9350 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+108%
4198
FireStream 9350
2016
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Jun 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
1024
Shading Units
1440
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Cypress
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
