Arc A380 vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+5147%
4198
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
1024
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Cedar
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
