Arc A380 vs FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+854%
4198
FireGL V8650
440
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Aug 2007
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
R600
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
