Arc A380 vs CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2050MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
4198
CMP 170HX
+200%
12630
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Sep 2021
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
70
1024
Shading Units
4480
64
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
128
Tensor Cores
280
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GA100
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
