Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1550MHz vs 1485MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+4%
3174
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3041
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M
3440
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+6%
3676
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A370M
1599
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+4%
1668
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
