Arc A370M vs FirePro W6170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+61%
3174
FirePro W6170M
1971
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Emerald
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
