Arc A370M vs FirePro M5800
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
FirePro M5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+510%
3174
FirePro M5800
520
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
1024
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
26W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Madison
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Madison XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
