Apple M4 10 Core vs Intel Celeron N3060
We compared two laptop CPUs: Apple M4 10 Core with 10 cores 4.41GHz and Intel Celeron N3060 with 2 cores 1.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Apple M4 10 Core 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (7500 vs 1600)
Larger memory bandwidth (120GB/s vs 25.6GB/s)
Higher base frequency (4.41GHz vs 1.6GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)
Intel Celeron N3060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (6W vs 22W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Apple M4 10 Core
+3246%
3848
Intel Celeron N3060
115
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Apple M4 10 Core
+7131%
15114
Intel Celeron N3060
209
Passmark CPU Single Core
Apple M4 10 Core
+640%
4605
Intel Celeron N3060
622
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Apple M4 10 Core
+3602%
24138
Intel Celeron N3060
652
General Parameters
May 2024
Release Date
Jan 2016
Apple
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
ARMv9
Instruction Set
x86-64
Apple M4
Core Architecture
Braswell
-
Processor Number
N3060
Apple M-Socket
Socket
BGA-1170
Apple M4 GPU (10-core)
Integrated Graphics
HD Graphics 400
Package
28 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
22 W
Power Consumption
6 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
90 °C
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
2
4
Performance Core Threads
2
4.41 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
6
Efficiency Cores
-
6
Efficiency Core Threads
-
2.59 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
10
Total Core Count
2
10
Total Thread Count
2
44
Multiplier
-
192 K per core
L1 Cache
48 K per core
16 MB shared
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
2 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
LPDDR5X-7500
Memory Types
DDR3L-1600
-
Max Memory Size
8 GB
-
Max Memory Channels
2
120 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
500 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1800 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
600 MHz
1280
Shader Units
-
80
Texture Units
-
40
Raster Operation Units
-
160
Execution Units
-
18
Power Consumption
-
4.6 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
