Apple M3 Ultra vs Intel Core i5 14500T
We compared two desktop CPUs: Apple M3 Ultra with 32 cores 4.5GHz and Intel Core i5 14500T with 14 cores 1.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Apple M3 Ultra 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Larger memory bandwidth (819.2GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)
Higher base frequency (4.5GHz vs 1.7GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core i5 14500T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Apple M3 Ultra
+26%
3247
Intel Core i5 14500T
2559
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Apple M3 Ultra
+206%
28107
Intel Core i5 14500T
9184
General Parameters
Mar 2025
Release Date
Jan 2024
Apple
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
ARMv8
Instruction Set
-
Apple M3
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-R
Apple M-Socket
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
-
Generation
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Package
184 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
140 W
Power Consumption
35 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
Intel
-
Die Size
215 mm²
CPU Performance
24
Performance Cores
6
24
Performance Core Threads
12
4.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
8
Efficiency Cores
8
8
Efficiency Core Threads
8
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1200 MHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
32
Total Core Count
14
32
Total Thread Count
20
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
45
Multiplier
17.0
-
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
-
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
LPDDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800
512 GB
Max Memory Size
-
8
Max Memory Channels
2
819.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
10240
Shader Units
-
640
Texture Units
-
320
Raster Operation Units
-
1280
Execution Units
-
140
Power Consumption
-
