AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Xeon X5365
We compared two server CPUs: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U with 6 cores 3.5GHz and Xeon X5365 with 4 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 3GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 65nm)
Lower TDP (28W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U
+689%
2519
Xeon X5365
319
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U
+606%
10308
Xeon X5365
1459
General Parameters
Apr 2024
Release Date
Aug 2007
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Hawk Point
Core Architecture
Clovertown
AMD Socket FP8
Socket
Intel Socket 771
Radeon 760M
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Generation
Xeon (Clovertown)
Package
25 billions
Transistor Count
0.582 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
65 nm
28 W
Power Consumption
150 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
63 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
178 mm²
Die Size
2x143 mm²
CPU Performance
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
6
Total Core Count
4
12
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
333 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
9.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per die
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR2, DDR3
2
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
4
PCIe Version
0
20
PCIe Lanes
-
