AMD Ryzen Embedded 7945 vs Intel Core i3 10320
We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen Embedded 7945 with 12 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Core i3 10320 with 4 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD Ryzen Embedded 7945 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Intel Core i3 10320 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 3.7GHz)
Score
General Parameters
Nov 2023
Release Date
May 2020
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raphael
Core Architecture
Comet Lake
-
Processor Number
i3-10320
AMD Socket AM5
Socket
LGA-1200
Radeon Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Generation
-
Package
13.14 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
95°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
2x71 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
122 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
4
-
Performance Core Threads
8
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
5.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
12
Total Core Count
4
24
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
37.0
Multiplier
38x
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5200
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
-
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1150 MHz
-
Shader Units
192
-
Texture Units
24
-
Raster Operation Units
3
-
Execution Units
24
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
-
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS
