AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Intel Core 9 270H
We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 with 6 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core 9 270H with 14 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (8000 vs 5200)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core 9 270H 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4.0)
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.0GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 16MB)
Lower TDP (45W vs 54W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
+8%
2705
Intel Core 9 270H
2504
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
11544
Intel Core 9 270H
+7%
12398
General Parameters
Jan 2025
Release Date
Dec 2024
Amd
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Zen 5 (Krackan Point)
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-H
FP8
Socket
Intel BGA 1744
Radeon 840M
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
-
Generation
Core 9(Raptor Lake-H Refresh)
Package
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
15-54 W
Power Consumption
45 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
-
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
3
Performance Cores
6
6
Performance Core Threads
12
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
3
Efficiency Cores
8
6
Efficiency Core Threads
8
2.0 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2000 MHz
3.4 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
6
Total Core Count
14
12
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20
Multiplier
27.0
80 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
LPDDR5X-8000,DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
256 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
2900 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
256
Shader Units
-
16
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
4
Execution Units
-
15-54
Power Consumption
-
1.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
