AMD Ryzen 5 2600H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus
We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 2600H with 4 cores 3.2GHz and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus with 10 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 3.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (42MB vs 4MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
993
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus
+136%
2347
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
2988
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus
+334%
12973
General Parameters
Sep 2018
Release Date
Apr 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
Qualcomm
Laptop
Type
Laptop
-
Instruction Set
ARMv9
Raven Ridge
Core Architecture
Snapdragon X
-
Processor Number
X1P-64-100
AMD Socket FP5
Socket
Custom
Radeon Vega 8
Integrated Graphics
Qualcomm Adreno X1
Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge))
Generation
Oryon
Package
4.95 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
45 W
Power Consumption
23 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
80 W
95°C
Peak Operating Temperature
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung TSMC
210 mm²
Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
10
-
Performance Core Threads
10
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
4
Total Core Count
10
8
Total Thread Count
10
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.0
Multiplier
34x
96 KB per core
L1 Cache
-
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
-
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
42 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200
Memory Types
LPDDR5X-8448
-
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
8
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
135 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
500 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
-
Shader Units
1536
-
Texture Units
48
-
Raster Operation Units
6
-
Execution Units
6
-
Power Consumption
-
Graphics Performance
3.8 TFLOPS
