AMD Ryzen 5 2600H vs Intel Core i5 11300H
We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 2600H with 4 cores 3.2GHz and Intel Core i5 11300H with 4 cores 2.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 3.1GHz)
Intel Core i5 11300H 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (4267 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (8MB vs 4MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
993
Intel Core i5 11300H
+30%
1292
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
2988
Intel Core i5 11300H
+43%
4292
General Parameters
Sep 2018
Release Date
Jan 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raven Ridge
Core Architecture
Tiger Lake H35
-
Processor Number
i5-11300H
AMD Socket FP5
Socket
BGA-1449
Radeon Vega 8
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge))
Generation
-
Package
4.95 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
45 W
Power Consumption
28-35 W
95°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
-
210 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
4
-
Performance Core Threads
8
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.6-3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
4
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.0
Multiplier
26-31x
96 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
1280 K per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
-
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1300 MHz
-
Shader Units
640
-
Texture Units
40
-
Raster Operation Units
20
-
Execution Units
80
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
1.41 TFLOPS
