AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Xeon w5 3525
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Xeon w5 3525 with 16 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 45MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Xeon w5 3525 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (290W vs 360W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P
2075
Xeon w5 3525
+2%
2135
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P
+51%
22897
Xeon w5 3525
15077
General Parameters
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4677
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon W (Sapphire Rapids)
Package
78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
290 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
4x477 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
96
Total Core Count
16
192
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
32.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
45 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
-
Max Memory Size
4 TB
12
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
128
PCIe Lanes
112
