AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2 with 6 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 1866)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
+11%
789
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2
708
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2
+64%
3436
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Sep 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Ivy Bridge-E
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 2011
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-E)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
1.86 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
130 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
70 °C
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
257 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
8
Total Core Count
6
8
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
35.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR3-1866
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
32
PCIe Lanes
-
