AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Intel Xeon E3 1125C
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Xeon E3 1125C with 4 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 40W)
Intel Xeon E3 1125C 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Gladden
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel BGA 1283
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon E3 (Gladden)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
1.16 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
40 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
216 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
20.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR3
2
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
-
32
PCIe Lanes
-
