AMD EPYC 9845 vs Opteron 8210 EE
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9845 with 160 cores 2.1GHz and Opteron 8210 EE with 2 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9845 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 667)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 1)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.8GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 90nm)
Opteron 8210 EE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 390W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2006
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Santa Rosa
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket F
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Santa Rosa)
Package
Transistor Count
0.227 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
45 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
mm²
Die Size
235 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
160
Performance Cores
-
320
Performance Core Threads
-
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
160
Total Core Count
2
320
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
9.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
128 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
320 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR2-667
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
