AMD EPYC 9845 vs Opteron 43CX EE
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9845 with 160 cores 2.1GHz and Opteron 43CX EE with 4 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9845 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (320MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)
Opteron 43CX EE 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 390W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Seoul
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket C32
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Seoul)
Package
Transistor Count
1.2 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
35 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
mm²
Die Size
315 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
160
Performance Cores
-
320
Performance Core Threads
-
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
160
Total Core Count
4
320
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
11.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 K
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB
320 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
