AMD EPYC 9845 vs Opteron 148
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9845 with 160 cores 2.1GHz and Opteron 148 with 1 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9845 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 400)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 90nm)
Opteron 148 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Lower TDP (85W vs 390W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2005
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Venus
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket 939
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Venus (E6))
Package
Transistor Count
0.114 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
85 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
mm²
Die Size
115 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
160
Performance Cores
-
320
Performance Core Threads
-
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
160
Total Core Count
1
320
Total Thread Count
1
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
11.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
128 KB
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB
320 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR1-400
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
