AMD EPYC 9845 vs Intel Xeon Phi 31S1P
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9845 with 160 cores 2.1GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 31S1P with 57 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9845 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 31S1P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (270W vs 390W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
Transistor Count
5 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
270 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
160
Performance Cores
-
320
Performance Core Threads
-
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
160
Total Core Count
57
320
Total Thread Count
228
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
11.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
320 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
