AMD EPYC 9845 vs Atom S1220
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9845 with 160 cores 2.1GHz and Atom S1220 with 2 cores 1.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9845 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.6GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)
Atom S1220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (8W vs 390W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Centerton
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel BGA 1283
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Atom (Centerton)
Package
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
8 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
160
Performance Cores
-
320
Performance Core Threads
-
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
160
Total Core Count
2
320
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
16.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
56 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
320 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
