AMD EPYC 9845 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9845 with 160 cores 2.1GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9845 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4800)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 5nm)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 320MB)
Lower TDP (360W vs 390W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Mar 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Genoa
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
360 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
6 nm
mm²
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
160
Performance Cores
-
320
Performance Core Threads
-
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
160
Total Core Count
96
320
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
24.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
320 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
12
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
