AMD EPYC 9825 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U with 6 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 5600)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 4nm)
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Lower TDP (28W vs 390W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Apr 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Hawk Point
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 760M
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Package
Transistor Count
25 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
28 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
mm²
Die Size
178 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
144
Total Core Count
6
288
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
35.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR5-5600
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
