AMD EPYC 9754S vs Centaur CHA
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9754S with 128 cores 2.25GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9754S 's Advantages
Released 122 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.25GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 360W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2023
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Bergamo
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4c (Bergamo))
Generation
CHA (CNS)
Package
71 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
70 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
8x73 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
128
Performance Cores
-
128
Performance Core Threads
-
2.25 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
128
Total Core Count
8
128
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
22.5
Multiplier
12.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
12
Max Memory Channels
4
460 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
