AMD EPYC 9475F vs Opteron 6276
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9475F with 48 cores 3.65GHz and Opteron 6276 with 16 cores 2.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9475F 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 1600)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Higher base frequency (3.65GHz vs 2.3GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 32nm)
Opteron 6276 's Advantages
Lower TDP (115W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9475F
+754%
1692
Opteron 6276
198
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9475F
+666%
13246
Opteron 6276
1729
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Nov 2011
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Interlagos
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket G34
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Interlagos)
Package
66.52 billions
Transistor Count
2.4 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
115 W
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
2x315 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
48
Performance Cores
-
96
Performance Core Threads
-
3.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
48
Total Core Count
16
96
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
36.5
Multiplier
11.5
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
768 KB
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per module
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB per die
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
4
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3-1600
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
4
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
