AMD EPYC 9475F vs Opteron 156
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9475F with 48 cores 3.65GHz and Opteron 156 with 1 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9475F 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (3.65GHz vs 3GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 90nm)
Opteron 156 's Advantages
Lower TDP (104W vs 400W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
May 2005
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Venus
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket 939
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Venus (E4))
Package
66.52 billions
Transistor Count
0.114 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
104 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
115 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
48
Performance Cores
-
96
Performance Core Threads
-
3.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
48
Total Core Count
1
96
Total Thread Count
1
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
36.5
Multiplier
15.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
128 KB
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR1-400
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
