AMD EPYC 9384X vs Intel Xeon Phi 7250F
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7250F with 68 cores 1.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 7250F 's Advantages
Lower TDP (230W vs 320W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2023
Release Date
Jun 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa-X
Core Architecture
Knights Landing
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Package
90.16 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
230 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.6 GHz
32
Total Core Count
68
64
Total Thread Count
272
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.5
Multiplier
14.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
768 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
