AMD EPYC 9375F vs AMD EPYC 9825
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9375F with 32 cores 3.85GHz and AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9375F 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.85GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Lower TDP (320W vs 390W)
AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 256MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 4nm)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Oct 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Turin
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Package
66.52 billions
Transistor Count
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
390 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
6 nm
mm²
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
32
Performance Cores
144
64
Performance Core Threads
288
3.85 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
32
Total Core Count
144
64
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
38.5
Multiplier
21.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
6 TB
Max Memory Size
6 TB
12
Max Memory Channels
12
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
