AMD EPYC 9274F vs Intel Xeon Phi SE10X
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9274F with 24 cores 4.05GHz and Intel Xeon Phi SE10X with 61 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9274F 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (4.05GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon Phi SE10X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 320W)
Score
General Parameters
Nov 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
52.56 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
300 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x72 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
4.05 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
24
Total Core Count
61
48
Total Thread Count
244
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
40.5
Multiplier
11.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
