AMD EPYC 9175F vs Xeon X5355
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9175F with 16 cores 4.2GHz and Xeon X5355 with 4 cores 2.667GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9175F 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (4.2GHz vs 2.667GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 65nm)
Xeon X5355 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9175F
+888%
2974
Xeon X5355
301
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9175F
+1503%
21724
Xeon X5355
1355
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Nov 2006
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Clovertown
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 771
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon (Clovertown)
Package
133.04 billions
Transistor Count
0.582 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
65 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
120 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
63 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
16x70.6 mm²
Die Size
2x143 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
16
Performance Cores
-
32
Performance Core Threads
-
4.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
16
Total Core Count
4
32
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
333 MHz
42.0
Multiplier
8.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per die
512 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR2, DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
